Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Romanelli

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 12, 1984No. 955PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

Vincent Romanelli was tried by jury and was convicted of rape, 1 unlawful restraint, 2 indecent assault, 3 involuntary deviate sexual, intercourse, 4 simple assault 5 and possession of instruments of crime. 6 On direct appeal from the judgment of sentence, he contends that the trial court erred in permitting the victim’s “hypnotically-refreshed” testimony to be received by the jury. We disagree and affirm the judgment of sentence.

On the morning of June 3, 1981, at or about 11:00 o’clock, Deborah Deckman was standing on the platform of the Gladstone station in Lansdowne, Delaware…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Murphy v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Commonwealth v. StoltzfusSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Commonwealth v. KichlineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Commonwealth v. NazarovitchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Commonwealth v. ScottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ReedSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  2. Commonwealth v. EvansSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Commonwealth v. GallowaySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Commonwealth v. DiNicolaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Commonwealth v. RomanelliSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API