Legal Opinion
Nyle Hooper v. Lockheed Martin Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 2, 2012No. 11-55278PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PREGERSON, Circuit Judge:"
Plaintiff-Appellant Nyle J. Hooper brings suit under the qui tam provisions of the False Claims Act (“FCA”), 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729-3733, against Lockheed Martin Corporation (“Lockheed”). The FCA permits individuals, known as “relators,” to file suit on behalf of the United States seeking damages from persons who file false claims for government funds. 31 U.S.C. § 3730(b)(1). Hooper alleges that Lockheed defrauded the United States Air Force under a contract for the Range Standardization and Automation (“RSA”) IIA program concerning software and hardware used to…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Cafasso v. General Dynamics C4 Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Robin Orr v. Bank of America, Nt & SaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- United States Ex Rel. Marcus v. HessSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- US Ex Rel. Geraldine Godecke v. Kinetic Concepts, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Jerry Hoang v. Bank of America, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Matthew Tarabochia v. Mickey AdkinsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- United States Ex Rel. Hunt v. Cochise Consultancy, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018
- United States Ex Rel. Kelly v. Serco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.