Attorney Grievance Commission v. Bear
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
RODOWSKY, Judge.
In this attorney grievance matter Bar Counsel’s entire case consisted of introducing into evidence the opinion by the Superior Court of the District of Columbia (the Superior Court) in Maxwell v. Gallagher, Civil Action No. 88-10687, and the opinion by the District of Columbia Court of Appeals in Maxwell v. Gallagher, 709 A.2d 100 (D.C.1998). The latter affirmed that part of the judgment of the Superior Court which ordered, based on conflict of interests, rescission against two attorneys of a corporate stock issuance. The principal question presented here is whether Bar…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- General Electric Capital Corporation v. Lease Resolution CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- United States v. MendozaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. Marvin P. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
- Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. Rotches Pork Packers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Berkey v. DeliaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Garrity v. Maryland State Board of PlumbingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2016
- Attorney Grievance v. SperlingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021
- In Re MaxwellDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
- Garrity v. Maryland State Board of PlumbingCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2015
- People v. ForsythSupreme Court of Colorado · 2012