Legal Opinion

State v. Markovich

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided May 29, 2002No. 1979-00PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

OPINION

2Opinion of the Court · MeyersMeyers, J.

in which KELLER, P.J., WOMACK, HERVEY, HOLCOMB, and COCHRAN, J.J., joined.

Appellee was charged with the Class B misdemeanor offense of Disrupting [a] Meeting or Procession. Tex. Pen.Code § 42.05. Appellee filed a pre-trial motion to quash the complaint by attacking the constitutionality of § 42.05. The trial court granted appellee’s motion to quash the complaint. The State appealed. The Third Court of Appeals reversed the trial judge’s decision. State v. Markovich, 34 *276S.W.3d 21 (Tex.App.-Austin 2000). We granted appellee’s petition for discretionary review to decide whether the…

3Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by38 opinions

  1. Duncantell v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2007
  2. Lebo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
  3. Sheldon v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2003
  4. Flores v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2007
  5. Ploeger v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2006

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API