Legal Opinion

Ploeger v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided January 12, 2006No. 01-04-01147-CRPublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TIM TART, Justice.

A jury convicted appellant, Charlie Ploe-ger Jr., of the class A misdemeanor offense of stalking. 1 See Tex. Pen.Code Ann. § 42.072 (Vernon 2003). The trial court assessed his punishment at 365 days in jail, suspended his sentence, and placed him on probation (community supervision) for 24 months. We determine (1) whether the trial court erred in charging the jury on stalking; (2) whether the evidence was legally sufficient to support the stalking conviction; and (3) whether the stalking statute is unconstitutional on its face or as applied to appellant. We reverse…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  2. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  3. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Malik v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  5. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Pomier v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2010
  2. Randall v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2007
  3. Hansen v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2006
  4. Webb v. SchlagalCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
  5. United States v. Alfonso Rodriguez-RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API