Legal Opinion
Portz v. St. Cloud State University
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided July 25, 2016No. Civil No. 16-1115 (JRT/LIB)PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR A PRELIMNINARY INJUNCTION
JOHN R. TUNHEIM, Chief Judge
Plaintiffs in this case are five student-athletes on the St. Cloud State University (“SCSU”) women’s tennis team. About four months ago, SCSU announced that it intended to eliminate several of its intercollegiate sports teams, including the women’s tennis team, to address declines in enrollment and tuition revenue. Plaintiffs filed this case against SCSU, alleging that the elimination of the women’s tennis team, if carried to fruition, would result in a violation of Title IX as well as the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Cannon v. University of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Dataphase Systems, Inc. v. C L Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
- Atascadero State Hospital v. ScanlonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Portz v. St. Cloud State Univ. & Minn. State Colls. & UniversitiesDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2018
- Evan Ng v. Board of Regents of the U of MCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2023
- Sophia Balow v. Michigan State Univ.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2022
- Anders v. California State University, FresnoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
- Anders v. California State University, FresnoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.