Panna v. Firstrust Savings Bank
District Court, D. New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BROTMAN, District Judge.
Plaintiffs have requested the court to reconsider its decision of October 30, 1990 granting defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) claims on statute of limitations grounds. 1 See Panna v. Firstrust, 749 F.Supp. 1372 (D.N.J.1990). The court has reconsidered that decision and, after closer examination, finds that plaintiffs’ complaint alleges a pattern of racketeering activity of which plaintiffs knew within the four-year limitations period. Therefore, the Third Circuit’s ruling in Keystone Ins. Co. v.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Agency Holding Corp. v. Malley-Duff & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Rose v. BartleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- Harry E. Fleischhauer v. C. Elvin Feltner, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Richard L. Conkling v. Bert S. TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Bowers v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'n, Act, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2001
- Resorts International, Inc. v. Greate Bay Hotel & Casino, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1992
- Assisted Living Associates of Moorestown, L.L.C. v. Moorestown TownshipDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
- Damiano v. Sony Music Entertainment, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1997
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.