Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Anthony Ross

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided February 24, 2017No. 11-3115Published

1DissentMillett, Circuit Judge

I join in full that portion of the opinion holding that the Attorney General lacked good cause to forgo notice and comment when issuing the Interim Rule, particularly given that he waited 217 days after the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (“SORNA”), 42 U.S.C. § 16901 et seq., took effect to put that rule out. See Applicability of the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act, 72 Fed. Reg. 8894-01 (Feb. 28, 2007) (codified at 28 C.F.R. pt. 72). I also agree that the error does not meet our high standard for harmlessness in this particular Administrative Procedure Act…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Clark v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  2. Carr v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  3. Reynolds v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  4. Kenneth P. Prill v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
  5. United States v. ValverdeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API