Legal Opinion

Woldberg v. Industrial Commission

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1929No. 4751PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFolland, J.

This is a proceeding in certiorari to review an award of the Industrial dommission denying compensation to the applicant, Walter A. Woldberg. The facts were stipulated before the commission.. They tend to show that there would be liability on the part of the employer if the applicant, who is a boy 12 years of age, were legally employed at the time of the happening of the accident. The commission made findings of fact and conclusions of law wherein it was found and concluded that, under the Workmen’s Compensation Act (Comp. Laws 1917, §§ 3061-3165, as amended) and the so-called Child-Labor Law…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Tumey v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Utah Copper Co. v. Industrial Commission of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Industrial Commission v. EvansUtah Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Salt Lake City v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Utah Fuel Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1920

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Park Utah Consolidated Mines Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1934
  2. United States Casualty Co. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
  3. Utah Department of Business Regulation, Division of Public Utilities, Business Telephone Systems v. Public Service CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Vali Convalescent & Care Institution v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Olsen v. LABOR COM'NCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API