Legal Opinion

Vali Convalescent & Care Institution v. Industrial Commission

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 11, 1982No. 17803PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEWART, Justice:

Vali Convalescent & Care Institution (hereinafter “Vali”) appeals the decision of the Board of Review of the Industrial Commission of Utah (hereinafter “Commission”) by increasing Vali’s unemployment compensation contribution rate for failure to file a timely quarterly report and payment. Vali contends that it was denied due process because the contribution rate was increased prior to a proper hearing. It also argues that because the subsequent hearings , were presided over by the Commission’s employees pursuant to Utah Code Ann., 1953, § 35-4-10, Vali was unconstitutionally…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Tumey v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. In Re Murchison.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  4. Gibson v. BerryhillSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Ward v. Village of MonroevilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Public Service Com'n of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1992
  2. V-1 Oil Co. v. Department of Environmental QualityUtah Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Moore v. American Coal Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Color Country Management v. Labor CommissionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2001
  5. Anderson v. Industrial Com'n of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API