Legal Opinion

Beard v. Clark

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 9, 1935No. 10089PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRAVES, Justice.

This statement of the nature and result of the suit is copied partly from the briefs of each party here:

“W. A. Clark instituted a suit in the district court of Muskogee County, Oklahoma, to recover damages for personal injuries he suffered in an automobile collision between his car and a truck. The accident occurred near Waggoner, Oklahoma. The suit was against Barclay Tun-stall, the alleged driver of the truck, W. M. Tunstall, the alleged owner of the truck, and D. A. Beard, the alleged principal, employer, or master, of the said W. M. Tunstall and Barclay Tunstall in the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Haddock v. HaddockSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  2. Harding v. HardingSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  3. O'Tier v. SellNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  4. Rodgers v. TobiasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  5. Norwood v. CobbTexas Supreme Court · 1859

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Utilities Natural Gas Corp. v. HillCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
  2. City of Toledo v. BurksOhio Court of Appeals · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API