Legal Opinion

State v. Lacey

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided January 23, 2002No. 21,502PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PICKARD, Judge.

{1} This case is the latest in a series of eases involving the double use of prior convictions to increase punishment. In State v. Keith, 102 N.M. 462, 463-65, 697 P.2d 145, 146-48 (Ct.App.1985), we held that a prior armed robbery conviction could not be used to raise the defendant’s underlying armed robbery conviction from a second degree felony to a first degree felony, and then be used to further enhance the defendant’s sentence under the general habitual offender statute. In State v. Haddenham, 110 N.M. 149, 151-54, 793 P.2d 279, 281-84 (Ct.App.1990), we held that a…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. GonzalesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. WoodwardNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. LuceroNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. State v. HaddenhamNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1990

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. WildgrubeNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. State v. LaceyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. State v. McDonaldNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. State v. FrancoNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. State v. GonzalesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2010

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API