State v. Lacey
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PICKARD, Judge.
{1} This case is the latest in a series of eases involving the double use of prior convictions to increase punishment. In State v. Keith, 102 N.M. 462, 463-65, 697 P.2d 145, 146-48 (Ct.App.1985), we held that a prior armed robbery conviction could not be used to raise the defendant’s underlying armed robbery conviction from a second degree felony to a first degree felony, and then be used to further enhance the defendant’s sentence under the general habitual offender statute. In State v. Haddenham, 110 N.M. 149, 151-54, 793 P.2d 279, 281-84 (Ct.App.1990), we held that a…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. GonzalesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. WoodwardNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. LuceroNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1986
- State v. HaddenhamNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1990
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. WildgrubeNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003
- State v. LaceyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2002
- State v. McDonaldNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003
- State v. FrancoNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2016
- State v. GonzalesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2010
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.