Legal Opinion
State ex rel. Hanson v. District Court
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 12, 1922No. 22,998PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Per curiam
On petition for a writ of mandamus to compel the court below to grant a change of venue.
There are 11 defendants, of whom four reside in 'Cottonwood county, three in Hennepin county, one in Ramsey .county, and three in the state of Iowa. The venue was laid in Ramsey county. The four residents of Cottonwood county, within time, made a proper demand for a change of the place of trial to that county. In this demand two1 of the other defendants joined, viz: Murphy, a resident of Hennepin county, and Menor a resident of Iowa. The clerk refused t» transmit the files to Cottonwood county. Thereupon…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State ex rel. Minneapolis Threshing-Machine Co. v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
- Flowers v. BartlettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
- Grimes v. EricsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
3Cited by5 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Oakland Motor Car Co. v. District Court of Waseca CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
- Dworsky v. HerbstSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- State Ex Rel. Williams v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
- Singer v. MandtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
- State Ex Rel. Nelson v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934