Legal Opinion

Schlereth v. Hardy

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 31, 2009No. SC 89402PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MICHAEL A. WOLFF, Judge.

Introduction

This case echoes a familiar refrain in the lore and constitutional law of notice: Due process requires notice, but what notice will do?

James Schlereth bought a piece of property that Jefferson County sold because the owner was delinquent in property taxes. Schlereth thereafter sent a notice of redemption rights to the tax-delinquent former owner by certified mail. The postal service attempted delivery twice.1

Schlereth’s notice was addressed correctly to the tax-delinquent former property owner at her residence. The former owner acknowledges that she knew of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Mennonite Board of Missions v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Dusenbery v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc. v. PopeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Jones v. FlowersSupreme Court of the United States · 2006

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. CEDARBRIDGE, LLC v. EasonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. Foreclosures of Liens for Delinquent Land Taxes Ex Rel. Collector of Revenue v. BhattiSupreme Court of Missouri · 2011
  3. Hames v. BellistriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. New Garden Restaurant, Inc. v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 2015
  5. Collector of Revenue ex rel. Director of Collections v. Parcels of Land Encumbered with Delinquent Land Tax LiensSupreme Court of Missouri · 2015

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API