Legal Opinion

Eads v. Retherford

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1888No. 13,193PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

The appellant alleges in his complaint that, in the year 1865, Burkett Eads died, the owner of the real estate in controversy; that he left as his heirs the appellant and Letha A. Retherford; that, in the year 1874, Letha A. Retherford died, the owner of one-half the real estate of which Burkett Eads had died seized; that the land was entered on the duplicate for taxation in the name of “ Burkett Eads’ heirs;” that partition of the land has never been made; that the appellant, since 1867, has been compelled to pay taxes on the entire tract of land, and to redeem from tax sales; that the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bayless v. GlennIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Page v. WebsterMichigan Supreme Court · 1860
  3. Carr v. State ex rel. CottinghamIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Sloan v. SewellIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Jenkins v. RiceIndiana Supreme Court · 1882

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Hanrick v. GurleyTexas Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Clute v. . CluteNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
  3. Marsh v. MorrisIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Moon v. JenningsIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Gage v. GageSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1890

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API