Legal Opinion

Gage v. Gage

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 5, 1890PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBingham, J.

“ There is a large class of contracts called implied contracts, which rest merely on construction of law, and in which there is, properly speaking, no assent of the parties to the terms by which they are bound. What the law looks to in these cases is, not the agreement of the parties, but their circumstances or acts; and from their circumstances or acts the law raises the duty and implies the promise by which, in the individual case, the party will be bound. In the case of an express contract, the law measures the extent of each party’s duty by the terms to which he has expressly agreed; in…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Satterlee v. MatthewsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
  2. Foster v. President of the Essex BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1819
  3. Van Horne v. FondaNew York Court of Chancery · 1821
  4. Wurts v. HoaglandSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  5. Grinder v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1850

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Swartzbaugh v. SampsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  2. Brauch v. ShawSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
  3. Smith v. Bank of New EnglandSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1897
  4. Greene v. McLeodSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2008
  5. Armstrong v. RodemacherSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API