Legal Opinion

Carr v. State ex rel. Cottingham

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 1885No. 12,289PublishedCited by 22 opinions

From the Hamilton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

This action was brought by the appellee to enforce an assessment for the construction of a ditch, levied under the act of April 8th, 1881.

The first objection to the validity of the assessment is that the notice of the filing of the petition was not sufficient.

The special finding states that proof of notice was made by affidavit showing that notices were posted. It was sufficient to give notice by posting as the statute provides. Meranda v. Spurlin, 100 Ind. 380. It is competent for the Legislature to provide what kind of notice shall be given, and where the notice is of the character…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Board of Commissioners v. HallIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Meranda v. SpurlinIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Cauldwell v. CurryIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Sloan v. SewellIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Jenkins v. RiceIndiana Supreme Court · 1882

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Jackson v. State ex rel. DyarIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Kuntz v. SumptionIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Prezinger v. HarnessIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Baldwin v. MoroneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Osborn v. SuttonIndiana Supreme Court · 1886

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API