London v. Tebo
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtBraley, J.
The respective demurrers not having been argued are to be treated as waived, and the rights and obligations of the parties depend on the terms of the original lease under which the lessee London entered into occupation and enjoyment of the demised premises. It provides that the lessee shall have the option to purchase the property from Tebo, the lessor and owner, “ at any time during the continuance of this lease or any renewal thereof ” upon payment of the purchase price, the amount of which and mode of payment are specifically stated. The master finds that the lessee gave notice of his…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Nelson Theatre Co. v. NelsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- Bleecker v. SmithNew York Supreme Court · 1835
- Pendill v. Union Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1887
- Lundin v. SchoeffelMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
- Porter v. MerrillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- City of East Orange v. Board of Water CommissionersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1963
- Markey v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
- Paeff v. Hawkins-Washington Realty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
- Wurdemann v. HjelmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- Whitehouse Restaurant, Inc. v. HoffmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.