Ahmad v. Town of Springdale
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
¶1 Dawud Ahmad,1 Bedreddin Imán, and Sameer Hatem (individual plaintiffs), each pro se, appeal the trial court’s orders denying writs of prohibition and mandamus; joining Muslim America, a Washington nonprofit corporation, as a necessary party; and granting frivolous action costs, including attorney fees, under RCW 4.84.185 to the town of Springdale. Muslim America appeals the costs award. The individual plaintiffs contend the trial court erred in asserting jurisdiction, denying individual standing to bring the writs, and awarding the costs. Muslim America contends the trial court erred in…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Cowiche Canyon Conservancy v. BosleyWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- Smith v. ShannonWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- Bowles v. Department of Retirement SystemsWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- Streater v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980
- Thurston County v. Cooper Point Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 2002
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Am. Prop. Cas. Ins. Ass'n v. KreidlerWashington Supreme Court · 2022
- Chris Williams v. City of SpokaneCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020