Legal Opinion

Engs v. Matson

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 29, 1882PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. JR. S. Williamson, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, J.

By the demurrer to the plea it is admitted that appellee had no interest in the bond; that he holds it solely for the use and benefit of Lawrence and Martin, and that they are the real parties in interest in the suit; that Lawrence and Martin were indebted to appellants, the principals in the bond, at and before suit brought.

Under these admitted facts were appellants entitled to make the set-off as claimed \

The general rule is that demands to be set off must be such as constitute a mutual credit between the parties, but by the term parties is meant not merely the nominal plaintiff and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bridge v. JohnsonCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1830
  2. Himrod v. BaughIllinois Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Marsh v. Oneida Central BankNew York Supreme Court · 1861
  4. Bliss v. BlissThe Superior Court of New York City · 1860
  5. Maas v. GoodmanNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1859

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Willoughby v. BallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
  2. Strong v. GordonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1920
  3. Streeter v. JunkerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1923
  4. Marcy v. WhallonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1904
  5. Cary v. NibloAppellate Court of Illinois · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API