Legal Opinion

People v. Shannon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 4, 2008PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRose, J.

Following a jury trial, defendant was convicted of one count of criminal mischief in the third degree based upon proof that he had slashed all four tires on the victim’s pickup truck. Defendant now appeals, contending that the prosecution failed to present legally sufficient evidence to establish that he caused damage of $250 or more to the vehicle (see Penal Law § 145.05 [2]). We affirm.

In a criminal mischief case, the damage to property is generally established by evidence of the reasonable cost of repairing the property (see People v Katovich, 238 AD2d 751, 752 [1997]; People v Ladd, 220…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. GrayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  2. People v. KatovichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  3. People v. CollinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  4. People v. DetwilerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  5. People v. LaddAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. HooksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  2. People v. AgronAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  3. People v. BeauvaisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  4. People v. AgronAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  5. People v. BeauvaisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API