Legal Opinion
State v. Nagel
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided June 25, 1981No. Crim. 761, Civ. 9908PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ERICKSTAD, Chief Justice.
The appellant, State of North Dakota, appeals from orders of the District Court of Cass County granting each of the defendants’ motions to suppress evidence.
The defendants, Monte Nagel, and a juvenile, Gary (a pseudonym), were arrested on November 21,1979. Prior to their arrest drug enforcement agents had received two deliveries of methamphetamines from Jay Braaten. Agent Kim Murphy arranged for a third delivery on November 21, 1979. Braaten’s movements were monitored by a surveillance team prior to the time he was supposed to meet Murphy. Braaten went to the…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Leland Patzner v. Joyce Burkett A/K/A Joyce McLaughlin Deborah Myerchin and Stutsman County, North Dakota, a Political SubdivisionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
- State v. DeCoteauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Commonwealth v. HuffmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- State v. JohnsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. MatthewsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.