Legal Opinion

State v. Breitenbach

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 26, 2021No. 120503PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 120,503 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. CORBIN J. BREITENBACH, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. The authorization of expert services for an indigent defendant in a criminal trial lies within the discretion of the district court. The decision will not be disturbed unless the defendant shows abuse of the trial court's discretion which results in prejudice to his substantial rights. 2. When considering whether to grant a self-represented defendant's request for an expert, the district court must first determine that the defendant is financially…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Ake v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. State v. WardSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
  5. State v. ThomasSupreme Court of Kansas · 2018

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. PetersSupreme Court of Kansas · 2024
  2. State v. FrantzSupreme Court of Kansas · 2022
  3. State v. TurnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2024
  4. State v. AlstonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2024
  5. State v. ButlerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2025

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API