Legal Opinion
In Re Intel Corp. Microprocesor Antitrust Lit.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided June 26, 2006No. MDL NO. 05-1717 JJF, CIV.A. 05-485 JJFPublished
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
FARNAN, District Judge.
Presently before the Court is Plaintiff Chance’s Motion To Reconsider (D.I.125). By his Motion, Plaintiff Marvin D. Chance requests the Court to reconsider its Order (D.I.101) denying Plaintiffs Motion To Remand (C.A. No. 06-265-JJF, D.I.33). For the reasons that follow, the Court will deny the Motion.
BACKGROUND
Chance’s action is one of a number of antitrust class action complaints against Defendant Intel Corporation (“Intel”) that have been consolidated before this Court by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. Plaintiff initially filed the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- James Brill, Plaintiff-Respondent v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., Defendant-PetitionerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- Bergstrom v. NoahSupreme Court of Kansas · 1999
- Ciena Corp. v. Corvis Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 2005
- Four B Corp. v. Daicel Chemical Industries, Ltd.District Court, D. Kansas · 2003