Oracle USA, Inc. v. SAP AG
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR PRECLUSION OF CERTAIN DAMAGES EVIDENCE PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 37(C) (1) AND 16(F)
ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE, United States Magistrate Judge.
Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion for Sanctions Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 37(c) and 16(f), by which Defendants seek to preclude Plaintiffs from introducing evidence of damages due to lost profits from sources other than software support services provided to customers that switched from Plaintiffs to TomorrowNow. Defendants argue that preclusion of evidence of profits lost from…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Yeti by Molly Ltd. v. Deckers Outdoor Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Ocelot Oil Corporation v. Sparrow IndustriesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Primrose Operating Co. v. National American InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
- Phinney v. Wentworth Douglas HospitalCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- In re High-Tech Employee Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2013
- Raygoza v. City of FresnoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2014
- Jones v. Travelers Casualty Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2015
- Cameron v. Apple Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2021
- Eagle Eyes Traffic Industry USA Holding LLC v. E-Go Bike LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2022
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.