Legal Opinion

City of Manhattan v. Kent

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 1, 1980No. 51,077PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

McFarland, J.:

The City of Manhattan instituted proceedings in eminent domain for a total taking of a 71.43-acre tract of land for airport expansion purposes. Thomas Sign Service leases, for sign purposes, a 50-foot by 2,300-foot strip of the tract adjacent to the Kansas Highway 18 right-of-way. The appraisers’ report found the total value of the tract to be $258,650 and, in an *514advisory report, stated that $21,000 of said value was attributed to the signs. The City and the landowners, Rex J. and Emma J. Kent, appealed to the district court.

A dispute…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Eisenring v. Kansas Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
  2. Urban Renewal Agency v. DeckerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
  3. Rostine v. City of HutchinsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  4. Ellis v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1979
  5. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc. v. City of SterlingSupreme Court of Colorado · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Bonanza, Inc. v. McLeanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1987
  2. County of Clark v. Sun State Properties, Ltd.Nevada Supreme Court · 2003
  3. – GFTLenexa, LLC v. City of Lenexa –Supreme Court of Kansas · 2019
  4. Board of Education, Unified School District No. 464 v. PorterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
  5. Union Gas System, Inc. v. CarnahanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1989

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API