City of Manhattan v. Kent
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
McFarland, J.:
The City of Manhattan instituted proceedings in eminent domain for a total taking of a 71.43-acre tract of land for airport expansion purposes. Thomas Sign Service leases, for sign purposes, a 50-foot by 2,300-foot strip of the tract adjacent to the Kansas Highway 18 right-of-way. The appraisers’ report found the total value of the tract to be $258,650 and, in an *514advisory report, stated that $21,000 of said value was attributed to the signs. The City and the landowners, Rex J. and Emma J. Kent, appealed to the district court.
A dispute…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Eisenring v. Kansas Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
- Urban Renewal Agency v. DeckerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
- Rostine v. City of HutchinsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
- Ellis v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1979
- Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc. v. City of SterlingSupreme Court of Colorado · 1974
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Bonanza, Inc. v. McLeanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1987
- County of Clark v. Sun State Properties, Ltd.Nevada Supreme Court · 2003
- – GFTLenexa, LLC v. City of Lenexa –Supreme Court of Kansas · 2019
- Board of Education, Unified School District No. 464 v. PorterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
- Union Gas System, Inc. v. CarnahanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1989
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.