P. J. Willis & Bro. v. Mooring & Blanchard

Willie, Chief Justice.

It was objected to the attachment proceedings below that the petition disclosed that part of the debt was due and part not due, and yet the affidavit did not show how much had matured and how much had not at the time the suit was commenced.

The petition did disclose both by means of the notes, which were copied in it, and by distinct averment, that two of these notes were due and one was not due when the suit was filed. It was a mere matter of calculation to ascertain the exact sum of money due upon *341each matured note at the time the suit was commenced, all the data for…