Legal Opinion

United States v. James v. Pacente

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided December 9, 1974No. 72-1988PublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FAIRCHILD, Circuit Judge.

Defendant Pacente appealed from convictions of extortion under 18 U.S.C. § 1951, and of a false material declaration before a grand jury, under § 1623. A panel of this court reversed and remanded for a new trial. United States v. Pa-cente, 490 F.2d 661 (7th Cir. 1973). Pursuant to the government’s suggestion, we reheard the appeal en banc.

Defendant, a Chicago police officer, was indicted on two counts. The first charged the extortion of $200 from Ko-*545vacevie, a liquor store owner. The second charged that defendant made a materially false declaration to the grand jury…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Garrity v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Opper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  4. Gardner v. BroderickSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Uniformed Sanitation Men Ass'n v. Commissioner of Sanitation of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. United States v. Sally A. Papia, Russell J. Enea, Joseph v. Basile, and Maximillion J. AdonnisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
  2. United States v. Harry Aleman and Leonard ForestaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
  3. United States v. Louis WernerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
  4. United States v. Clarence E. BraaschCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
  5. United States v. Alex J. RaineriCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API