Legal Opinion
Bateman v. Ford Motor Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided April 18, 1962No. Civ. A. No. 30743PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN W. LORD, Jr., District Judge.
This action was brought in this Court for an injunction and damages under the “Dealer’s Day in Court Act,” 15 U.S.C.A. §§ 1221-1225. Plaintiffs sought to restrain termination of their franchise to sell and service Ford Motor products. Since the agency has been terminated by Ford Motor Company during the pendency of the action, they now seek (in addition to their claim for damages; not presently at issue) to enjoin defendant from refusing to furnish Ford Motor products to them.
The prior opinion and order of this Court, dated January 23, 1962, D.C., 202 F.Supp.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Irwin v. DixionSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
- Madison Square Garden Corporation v. BraddockCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1937
- Truly v. WanzerSupreme Court of the United States · 1847
- Howard Bateman and Marguerite B. Jones, Partners, Trading as Ernest Jones Company v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1962
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Cecil Corley Motor Co., Inc. v. General Motors Corp.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1974
- Southern Rambler Sales, Inc. v. American Motors Corporation and American Motors Sales CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- Howard Bateman and Marguerite B. Jones, Partners, Trading as Ernest Jones Company v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1962
- Sam Goldfarb Plymouth, Inc. v. Chrysler CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1962
- Zebelman v. Chrysler CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1968
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.