Legal Opinion
Sam Goldfarb Plymouth, Inc. v. Chrysler Corporation
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided June 29, 1962No. Civ. A. 22570PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MACHROWICZ, District Judge.
This Court has carefully reviewed the transcript of the testimony presented at the hearing on the preliminary temporary injunction in this matter on June 14th and June 15th, 1962, and also the briefs filed by counsel for the plaintiff and the defendant.
The plaintiff brings action under the “Dealer’s Day in Court Act”, 15 U.S.C.A. §§ 1221-1225, which authorizes suits by dealers against automobile manufacturers for
“damages * * * sustained * * by reason of the failure of said automobile manufacturer * * * to act in good faith in performing or complying with any of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Howard Bateman and Marguerite B. Jones, Partners, Trading as Ernest Jones Company v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1962
- Murray Hill Restaurant, Inc. v. Thirteen Twenty One Locust, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1938
- Leach v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1960
- Staten Island Motors, Inc. v. American Motors Sales Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1959
- Bateman v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1962
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Thayer Plymouth Center, Inc. v. Chrysler Motors Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1967
- Grove Press, Inc. v. Collectors Publication, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 1967
- Kaiser v. Local No. 83Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Corning Glass Works v. Lady Cornella Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1969
- Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1963
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.