Legal Opinion

In Re Richardson

California Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1930No. Docket Nos. L.A. 11297 and 11311PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WASTE, C. J.—

Applications have been made to this court by Howell W. Richardson and Benjamin Elconin, attorneys at law, for a review of the action of the Board of Governors of The State Bar of California recommending their disbarment, following an investigation and report by Local Administrative Committee No. 6 of Los Angeles County. The two attorneys were involved in the same transactions out of which the disbarment proceedings arose, and the legal questions raised by each are exactly the same. Therefore, the applications will be considered as one proceeding.

On October 21, 1925, Lewis H.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State Bar of California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  2. In Re ShattuckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  3. In Re CateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Werner v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Younger v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Hinds v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  4. McIntosh v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Tennessee Bar Association v. FreemonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1961

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API