Legal Opinion
Davis v. Howell
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided June 25, 1962No. 21681PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Mobley, Justice.
Count 1 of the motion seeks to set aside the verdict on the ground that it is too indefinite for enforcement. “There is no provision in law for setting aside a verdict except upon a motion for a new trial or a motion equivalent to a motion for a new trial, except as provided in the Civil Code (1910), § 6144 [now Code § 6-804].” Corr v. Corr, 213 Ga. 699, 700 (100 SE2d 922); Buchanan v. Nash, 211 Ga. 343, 344 (89 SE2d 637); McDonald v. Wimpy, 203 Ga. 498, 500 (46 SE2d 906); New York Life Ins. Co. v. Cook, 182 Ga. 409 (185 SE 711); Lovelace v. Lovelace, 179 Ga. 822 (1e) (177 SE…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Lovelace v. LovelaceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
- Bank of Tupelo v. CollierSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
- Dollar v. Fred W. Amend Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1938
- Pope v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1942
- Rucker v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Davis v. HowellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1964
- Abe Gellman & Co. v. Jaco Pants, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1962