Ogunrinu v. City of Riverside
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM *
Ogunrinu appeals from the district court’s summary judgment adverse to his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against Meyer, Lanzillo, the City of Riverside, and the City of Riverside Police Department (together, City). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and we affirm.
I
A summary judgment is reviewed de novo. United States v. City of Tacoma, 332 F.3d 574, 578 (9th Cir.2003). Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, we determine whether there are any genuine issues of material fact and whether the district court correctly applied the relevant…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- City of Los Angeles v. HellerSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Robin Orr v. Bank of America, Nt & SaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Scott v. HenrichCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Andres M. Martinez v. G.D. Stanford W. Owen M. Atkinson D. Rockholt J. StovallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Aaron Vrh v. J. Zamora, et al.District Court, E.D. California · 2026
- Estate of Alejandro Sanchez v. County of StanislausDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
- Nguyen v. DeweyDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2024