Legal Opinion

Aaron Vrh v. J. Zamora, et al.

District Court, E.D. California

Decided March 30, 2026No. 1:25-cv-01385Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 AARON VRH, Case No.: 1:25-cv-01385-JLT-CDB 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO DISMISS, WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND, 13 v. FOR A FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM UPON WHICH RELIEF CAN BE GRANTED 14 J. ZAMORA, et al., FOLLOWING SCREENING OF PLAINTIFF’S THIRD AMENDED 15 Defendants. COMPLAINT 16 14-Day Objection Period 17 18 Plaintiff Aaron Vrh is appearing pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 19 section 1983. 20 I. INTRODUCTION 21 The Court issued its First Screening Order on January 27, 2026.…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API