Legal Opinion

Estate of Alejandro Sanchez v. County of Stanislaus

District Court, E.D. California

Decided June 3, 2020No. 1:18-cv-00977Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ESTATE OF ALEJANDRO SANCHEZ No. 1:18-cv-00977-DAD-BAM and BERTHA SANCHEZ, 12 Plaintiffs, 13 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION v. FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SECOND 14 AMENDED COMPLAINT COUNTY OF STANISLAUS, et al., 15 (Doc. No. 59) Defendants. 16 17 18 This matter is before the court on plaintiffs’ motion for leave to file a second amended 19 complaint (“SAC”). (Doc. No. 59.) The court reviewed the relevant briefing and deemed the 20 matter suitable for decision on the papers pursuant to Local Rule 230(g). For…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Keith v. VolpeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  3. Gomez v. WhitneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  4. Lyon v. U.S. Immigration & Customs EnforcementDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2015
  5. Eminence Capital, Llc, and Jay Spechler v. Aspeon, Inc. Richard P. StackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API