Legal Opinion

Bemis v. Allen

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 24, 1903PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Polk District Court. — Hon. S. F. Prouty, Judge. Action to recover possession of land. Verdict and judgment for plaintiff, and the defendant appeals.—

1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.

During the year ending March 1, 1900, the defendant occupied the land in controversy as the tenant of plaintiff. On February 5, 1900, a part of the rent was unpaid; and, in addition to this claim, plaintiff *161also held defendant’s note, based upon other business transactions, to the amount of about $1,285. On the date named the parties signed another agreement of lease for the succeeding year, which lease, with defendant’s notes for the agreed rent was deposited with one Miller, who executed and delivered to defendant a receipt" or instrument in writing in the following words: “Des Moines,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Deardorff v. ForesmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
  2. Mahana v. BluntSupreme Court of Iowa · 1865
  3. Wilmer v. FarrisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1875
  4. Kimberly v. PatchinNew York Court of Appeals · 1859

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Nichols v. KirchnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1949
  2. McCormick Harvesting Machine Co. v. MorlanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API