Harbor City Canning Co. v. Dant
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLangdon, J.
This is an appeal by defendants from a judgment against them for damages for breach of a contract for the purchase by them of a large quantity of peach pulp. About many of the facts there is no dispute. On July 9, 1919, the copartnership of Christenson, Hanify & Weatherwax ordered in writing from plaintiff 10,000 eases of peach pulp, described in the contract as “6/10s” (which was elucidated by the testimony as signifying six number 10 cans to each case) at a price of $7.50 per dozen cans. It was also provided that the peach pulp should be of standard quality 1919 season’s pack and that, in…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- MacLay Company v. MeadsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
- Redwood City Salt Co. v. WhitneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Douglas Fir Exploitation & Export Co. v. ComynCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1922
3Cited by2 opinions
- Fazzi v. PetersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- DeMartini v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949