Legal Opinion

Harbor City Canning Co. v. Dant

California Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 1927No. Docket No. S.F. 11459PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLangdon, J.

This is an appeal by defendants from a judgment against them for damages for breach of a contract for the purchase by them of a large quantity of peach pulp. About many of the facts there is no dispute. On July 9, 1919, the copartnership of Christenson, Hanify & Weatherwax ordered in writing from plaintiff 10,000 eases of peach pulp, described in the contract as “6/10s” (which was elucidated by the testimony as signifying six number 10 cans to each case) at a price of $7.50 per dozen cans. It was also provided that the peach pulp should be of standard quality 1919 season’s pack and that, in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. MacLay Company v. MeadsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
  2. Redwood City Salt Co. v. WhitneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Douglas Fir Exploitation & Export Co. v. ComynCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1922

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fazzi v. PetersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. DeMartini v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API