Haynes v. City of Seattle
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Tallman, J., entered February 28, 1914, dismissing an action for personal injuries sustained by reason of a defective street, upon sustaining a demurrer ore terms to the complaint.
1Opinion of the CourtGose, J.
This is an action for damages for personal injuries to the plaintiff, caused by the alleged negligence of the defendant. Immediately after the jury was empaneled and sworn to try the case, the defendant, demurred to the complaint ore tenus, upon the ground that the complaint does *52not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The demurrer was sustained, and the plaintiff electing to stand upon her complaint and declining to plead further, a judgment was entered dismissing the action. This appeal followed.
It is alleged in the complaint that Crockett street, in the respondent city,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Born v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1902
- Carstens v. DeSellemWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- Collins v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1911
- Ehrhardt v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1903
- Durham v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1902
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Johnson v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Kelleher v. Ephrata School District No. 165Washington Supreme Court · 1960
- Whittlesey v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1917
- Forseth v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1947
- Howe v. Whitman CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1922
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.