Legal Opinion
New York Ass'n for Retarded Children, Inc. v. Keator
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 30, 1993PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMahoney, J.
Appeal from an amended judgment of the Supreme Court (Best, J.) in favor of plaintiff, entered July 29, 1992 in Montgomery County, upon a decision of the court, without a jury.
In 1982 defendant, Karl Huber, Stewart Dean and other investors purchased the technology for a product known as a coloreader, a device designed to assist those with impaired sight to read printed matter. Shortly thereafter, they formed a corporation known as Eyetronics Inc., applied for a patent and set about marketing the devices and locating someone to manufacture them. To this end, defendant entered into negotiations…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Bowles v. ErricoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- MacDougal v. Birdie Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963
3Cited by24 opinions
- McCarthy v. AzureCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- Benasra v. MarcianoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Hadar v. Concordia Yacht Builders, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- Scully Signal Co. v. JoyalDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1995
- State v. MarkowitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.