Legal Opinion
Hadar v. Concordia Yacht Builders, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 13, 1995No. 92 Civ. 3768 (RLC)PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERT L. CARTER, District Judge.
Defendants Concordia Custom Yachts, Inc. (“Concordia Custom”) and Burlington Industries, Inc. (“Burlington”) assert that they are improper parties and move for summary judgment on the causes of action asserted against them by the plaintiff and on the cross-claims asserted against them by co-defendants. All defendants move for summary judgment on plaintiffs strict liability and negligence causes of action on the grounds that solely economic damages are alleged. Defendants System Three Resins (“System Three”), Burlington, Northern Fiberglass Sales, Inc.…
2Cases cited65 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Yoder v. Honeywell, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- Sebago, Inc. v. Beazer East, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1998
- Simon v. Philip Morris Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2000
- Singh v. GoordDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- Bhakta v. County of MauiHawaii Supreme Court · 2005
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.