Legal Opinion

City of Westlake v. Cougill

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1978No. 78-350PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Per curiam

The cause at bar presents two issues: (1) Whether the time within which appellee was required by R. C. 2945.71 et seq. to be brought to trial expired prior to his waiver of the statutory mandate, and (2) whether the *232execution of the waiver form in this cause (which seeks a continuance and, by its title, purports to waive appellee’s speedy trial rights under R. C. 2945.71, et seq.) removed the case from the operation of those statutes.

R. C. 2945.71(B) (1) provides that an individual charged with a misdemeanor, other than a minor misdemeanor, must be brought to trial “ [w] ithin forty-five days…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. McBreenOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  2. State v. PudlockOhio Supreme Court · 1975

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. PachayOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State v. KingOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State v. O'BrienOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  4. State v. BroughtonOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  5. State v. BonarrigoOhio Supreme Court · 1980

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API