Legal Opinion

State v. Bonarrigo

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1980No. 79-494PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellees were arrested on June 23, 1976. Their trial commenced on June 16, 1977, 358 calendar days from the date of arrest. The state has not argued that any of the contingencies set forth in R. C. 2945.72 occurred in this case thereby extending the statutory time within which these accused were required to be brought to trial. The period of 358 days is, of course, in excess of the 270 days in which those accused of even the most serious felony charges must, according to R. C. 2945.71(C)2 be brought to trial, absent extension. Pur*9suant to R. C. 2945.73(B),3 appellees moved “at or prior to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. Donald HillegasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
  2. City of Westlake v. CougillOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  3. State v. SpratzOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  4. State v. PughOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  5. State v. StephensOhio Court of Appeals · 1977

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. State v. PachayOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  3. State v. BickerstaffOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State v. BakerOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State v. BroughtonOhio Supreme Court · 1991

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API