Legal Opinion

Royal Indemnity Co. v. North Texas Nat. Bank

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided January 21, 1931No. Motions Nos. 9100, 9102, 9092; No. 1323-5426PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCbitz, J.

This case is now before us on motions for rehearing filed by North Texas National Bank, Southwest National Bank, and American Surety Company of New York.

We have read and carefully considered all of said motions and arguments submitted therewith, but still adhere to all holdings of law expressed in our original opinion [25 S.W.(2d) 8221. However, we have concluded on further examination of the record, as pointed out in the motions of the two banks, that no purpose can be served by remanding any part of this cause to the district court for a new trial.

The record conclusively shows that…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. American Surety Co. of New York v. North Texas Nat. BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Smith v. Federal Surety Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
  2. First Nat. Bank of Temple v. Continental Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1938
  3. Home Indemnity Company v. GonzalezCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
  4. Home Indemnity Company v. GonzalezCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API