Legal Opinion

Home Indemnity Company v. Gonzalez

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 21, 1964No. 14281PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POPE, Justice.

Plaintiff, E. J. Gonzalez, recovered a judgment against The Home Indemnity Company for $5,000.00, which was the full amount of a fidelity bond, issued to indemnify Gonzalez against losses caused by the fraud or dishonesty of Jessie Santos, who was Gonzalez’s partner in the operation of Laredo Poultry & Meat Company. ■ Gonzalez also recovered a nil dicit judgment against Santos for $8,199.00, but he has not appealed. The judgment was rendered upon jury findings that Santos caused losses totaling $8,199.00 by his fraud or dishonesty. We reverse and render the judgment since the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Joske v. IrvineTexas Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Hinnant v. Tidewater Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  3. Irvin Jacobs & Co. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. Of MarylandCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1953
  4. Great American Insurance Co. v. LangdeauTexas Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Continental Casualty Co. v. First Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. National Surety Corp. v. First National Bank of MidlandCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
  2. Home Indemnity Company v. GonzalezCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
  3. Progressive Casualty Insurance v. First BankDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API