Legal Opinion

FarmPro Services, Inc. v. Finneman

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 19, 2016No. 27695, 27706PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZINTER, Justice.

[¶ 1.] The issue in this appeal concerns a redemptioner’s entitlement to the return of money spent in unsuccessful attempts to redeem in a mortgage foreclosure. A landowners’ successor in interest, a landowners’ strawman, and judgment lien creditors engaged in competing attempts to redeem in two mortgage foreclosures. Although the successor in interest ■ successfully redeemed from a judgment lien creditor in the first foreclosure, a senior mortgagee started a second foreclosure; a second judgment lien creditor redeemed in the second foreclosure; and the second foreclosure…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Dowling Family Partnership v. Midland Farms, LLCSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Copper Belle Mining Co. v. GleesonArizona Supreme Court · 1913
  3. East Jersey Savings & Loan Ass'n v. ShattoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987
  4. Anderson v. KellerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Rabo Agrifinance, Inc. v. Rock Creek FarmsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sturzenbecher v. Sioux County Ranch, LLCSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2025
  2. David Finneman v. Walter LaidlawCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2023
  3. Finneman v. Lutz-Laidlaw PartnershipDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2023
  4. Finneman v. Lutz-Laidlaw PartnershipDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2021
  5. Finneman v. Lutz-Laidlaw PartnershipDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2024

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API