Finneman v. Lutz-Laidlaw Partnership

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA WESTERN DIVISION DAVID M. FINNEMAN and CONNIE S. FINNEMAN, Plaintiffs © 5:21-cv-5025 VS. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RELIEF PURSUANT TO RULES WALTER ROBERT LAIDLAW and 60(b)(1) and 60(b)(6) FRANCES EVON LAIDLAW, Defendants Pending before the Court is the pro se Plaintiffs’ motion for relief pursuant to F.R.C.P. 60(b). (Doc.54). Plaintiffs assert the Court’s award of attorney fees to Defendants involved a procedural misstep and should be vacated because their due process rights were violated. Defendants have responded…