Finneman v. Lutz-Laidlaw Partnership
District Court, D. South Dakota
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT □ DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA WESTERN DIVISION □□ □ ICR 2 CR SCORE fC Cf ff fo CR ACR fo Rae RA RCO Eo RCA CSR CER a a a fa CR oo ea aR aR a Ro oR a ofa DAVID M. FINNEMAN, husband; and * | CIV 21-5025 | CONNIE S. FINNEMAN, wife, * . Plaintiffs, : . . . . * , . ‘ . NB * MEMORANDUM OPINION . □ * . AND ORDER □ -. WALTER ROBERT LAIDLAW, husband; . * . □ and. FRANCES EVON LAIDLAW, wife, * | . . . * at . Defendants. . a | □ Pending before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 15) Plaintiffs’ First □ °° _ Amended Complaint (Doc. 10) for various grounds discussed…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Gasperini v. Center for Humanities, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Porous Media Corporation v. Pall CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.