Legal Opinion
Moore v. Kimball
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided December 19, 1939No. Docket No. 18, Calendar No. 40,656PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcAllister, J.
Plaintiffs, home owners in Lakewood boulevard addition, a subdivision in the city of Detroit, filed suit to restrain defendant from erecting a building to be used for dental and medical offices on a vacant lot which he purchased in 1937 in the subdivision. When the plat of the subdivision was recorded, December 23, 1913, in the office of the register of deeds for Wayne county, and the sale of lots therein commenced, the owners of the subdivision included in each of the deeds to lots purchased the following restrictive covenants:
“As a further consideration of this conveyance it is agreed…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Sanborn v. McLeanMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
- Casterton v. PlotkinMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
- Nerrerter v. LittleMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
- Brown v. HojnackiMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
- Boston Baptist Social Union v. Trustees of Boston UniversityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Turner v. Bituminous Casualty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1976
- Horace Case v. Arthur E. MorrisetteCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- Phyllis Davis v. Echo Valley Condominium Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
- Gortney v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1996
- Boston-Edison Protective Ass'n v. Paulist Fathers, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1943
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.