Legal Opinion

Brown v. Hojnacki

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 1935No. Docket No. 85, Calendar No. 38,192PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorth, J.

This is a suit in equity by which plaintiffs seek to enjoin defendants from an alleged violation of restrictions covering lots composing McPherson’s Saginaw street addition in the city of Lansing, Michigan. Defendants Felix, Hojnacki and wife are the contract vendees and the defendant Capitol Savings & Loan Company is the owner in fee and the contract vendor of a corner lot in this addition. Plaintiffs Brown own the property adjoining on the west and plaintiffs Miers own the property adjoining on the north. The restriction sought to he enforced reads:

“No shop, factory, store, saloon, or…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Library Neighborhood Ass'n v. GoosenMichigan Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Terrien v. ZwitMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Bloomfield Estates Improvement Ass'n, Inc. v. City of BirminghamMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
  3. City of Huntington Woods v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Boston-Edison Protective Ass'n v. Paulist Fathers, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Moore v. KimballMichigan Supreme Court · 1939

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API