Windstanley v. Second National Bank
Indiana Court of Appeals
Prom the Lawrence Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtLotz, J.
The facts essential to the determination of this appeal appear in the special findings made by the court and are in substance as follows :
*545The plaintiff below, and appellee here, is a banking-corporation organized under the laws of the United States, and does a general banking business in the city of Louisville, Kentucky. The appellants, the Windstanleys and Breyfogle, were a co-partnership, doing a general hanking business at Bedford, Indiana, under the name of the ‘ ‘ Bedford Bank. ” The Louisville hank sent to the Bedford hank for collection various claims aggregating $1,179.89. Prior to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- National Bank v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Matter of Cavin v. . GleasonNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
- McLeod v. EvansWisconsin Supreme Court · 1886
- Peak v. EllicottSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
- Continental National Bank v. WeemsTexas Supreme Court · 1888
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- State ex rel. Sorensen v. Farmers State BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1931
- Shopert v. Indiana National BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1908
- Fletcher Savings & Trust Co. v. American State BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1925
- Rottger, Rec. v. First-Merchants Natl. BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1933
- Terre Haute Trust Co. v. Scott, Rec.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1932
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.